Source code for PEPit.examples.nonconvex_optimization.no_lips_1

import numpy as np

from PEPit import PEP
from PEPit.functions import ConvexFunction
from PEPit.functions import ConvexIndicatorFunction
from PEPit.primitive_steps import bregman_gradient_step


[docs] def wc_no_lips_1(L, gamma, n, wrapper="cvxpy", solver=None, verbose=1): """ Consider the constrainted non-convex minimization problem .. math:: F_\\star \\triangleq \\min_x \\{F(x) \equiv f_1(x)+f_2(x) \\} where :math:`f_2` is a closed convex indicator function and :math:`f_1` is possibly non-convex and :math:`L`-smooth relatively to :math:`h`, and where :math:`h` is closed proper and convex. This code computes a worst-case guarantee for the **NoLips** method. That is, it computes the smallest possible :math:`\\tau(n, L, \\gamma)` such that the guarantee .. math:: \\min_{0 \\leqslant t \\leqslant n-1} D_h(x_{t+1}; x_t) \\leqslant \\tau(n, L, \\gamma) (F(x_0) - F(x_n)) is valid, where :math:`x_n` is the output of the **NoLips** method, and where :math:`D_h` is the Bregman distance generated by :math:`h`: .. math:: D_h(x; y) \\triangleq h(x) - h(y) - \\nabla h (y)^T(x - y). In short, for given values of :math:`n`, :math:`L`, and :math:`\\gamma`, :math:`\\tau(n, L, \\gamma)` is computed as the worst-case value of :math:`\\min_{0 \\leqslant t \\leqslant n-1}D_h(x_{t+1}; x_t)` when :math:`F(x_0) - F(x_n) \\leqslant 1`. **Algorithms**: This method (also known as Bregman Gradient, or Mirror descent) can be found in, e.g., [1, Section 3]. For :math:`t \\in \\{0, \\dots, n-1\\}`, .. math:: x_{t+1} = \\arg\\min_{u \\in R^d} \\nabla f(x_t)^T(u - x_t) + \\frac{1}{\\gamma} D_h(u; x_t). **Theoretical guarantees**: The **tight** theoretical upper bound is obtained in [1, Proposition 4.1] .. math:: \\min_{0 \\leqslant t \\leqslant n-1} D_h(x_{t+1}; x_t) \\leqslant \\frac{\\gamma}{n(1 - L\\gamma)}(F(x_0) - F(x_n)) **References**: The detailed setup and results are availaible in [1]. The PEP approach for studying such settings is presented in [2]. `[1] J. Bolte, S. Sabach, M. Teboulle, Y. Vaisbourd (2018). First order methods beyond convexity and Lipschitz gradient continuity with applications to quadratic inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 28(3), 2131-2151. <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.06461.pdf>`_ `[2] R. Dragomir, A. Taylor, A. d’Aspremont, J. Bolte (2021). Optimal complexity and certification of Bregman first-order methods. Mathematical Programming, 1-43. <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.08510.pdf>`_ DISCLAIMER: This example requires some experience with PEPit and PEPs (see Section 4 in [2]). Args: L (float): relative-smoothness parameter. gamma (float): step-size (equal to 1/(2*L) for guarantee). n (int): number of iterations. wrapper (str): the name of the wrapper to be used. solver (str): the name of the solver the wrapper should use. verbose (int): level of information details to print. - -1: No verbose at all. - 0: This example's output. - 1: This example's output + PEPit information. - 2: This example's output + PEPit information + solver details. Returns: pepit_tau (float): worst-case value. theoretical_tau (float): theoretical value. Example: >>> L = 1 >>> gamma = 1 / (2 * L) >>> pepit_tau, theoretical_tau = wc_no_lips_1(L=L, gamma=gamma, n=5, wrapper="cvxpy", solver=None, verbose=1) (PEPit) Setting up the problem: size of the Gram matrix: 20x20 (PEPit) Setting up the problem: performance measure is the minimum of 5 element(s) (PEPit) Setting up the problem: Adding initial conditions and general constraints ... (PEPit) Setting up the problem: initial conditions and general constraints (1 constraint(s) added) (PEPit) Setting up the problem: interpolation conditions for 3 function(s) Function 1 : Adding 30 scalar constraint(s) ... Function 1 : 30 scalar constraint(s) added Function 2 : Adding 30 scalar constraint(s) ... Function 2 : 30 scalar constraint(s) added Function 3 : Adding 49 scalar constraint(s) ... Function 3 : 49 scalar constraint(s) added (PEPit) Setting up the problem: additional constraints for 0 function(s) (PEPit) Compiling SDP (PEPit) Calling SDP solver (PEPit) Solver status: optimal (wrapper:cvxpy, solver: MOSEK); optimal value: 0.19999999999153717 (PEPit) Primal feasibility check: The solver found a Gram matrix that is positive semi-definite All the primal scalar constraints are verified up to an error of 2.415956323886803e-12 (PEPit) Dual feasibility check: The solver found a residual matrix that is positive semi-definite All the dual scalar values associated with inequality constraints are nonnegative up to an error of 2.576047642211146e-12 (PEPit) The worst-case guarantee proof is perfectly reconstituted up to an error of 4.834093507252019e-11 (PEPit) Final upper bound (dual): 0.1999999999931975 and lower bound (primal example): 0.19999999999153717 (PEPit) Duality gap: absolute: 1.6603385333269216e-12 and relative: 8.301692666985887e-12 *** Example file: worst-case performance of the NoLips in Bregman divergence *** PEPit guarantee: min_t Dh(x_(t+1), x_(t)) <= 0.2 (F(x_0) - F(x_n)) Theoretical guarantee : min_t Dh(x_(t+1), x_(t)) <= 0.2 (F(x_0) - F(x_n)) """ # Instantiate PEP problem = PEP() # Declare two convex functions and a convex indicator function d1 = problem.declare_function(ConvexFunction, reuse_gradient=True) d2 = problem.declare_function(ConvexFunction, reuse_gradient=True) func1 = (d2 - d1) / 2 h = (d1 + d2) / 2 / L func2 = problem.declare_function(ConvexIndicatorFunction, D=np.inf) # Define the function to optimize as the sum of func1 and func2 func = func1 + func2 # Then define the starting point x0 of the algorithm and its function value f0 x0 = problem.set_initial_point() gh0, h0 = h.oracle(x0) gf0, f0 = func1.oracle(x0) _, F0 = func.oracle(x0) # Compute n steps of the NoLips starting from x0 xx = [x0 for _ in range(n + 1)] gfx = gf0 ghx = [gh0 for _ in range(n + 1)] hx = [h0 for _ in range(n + 1)] for i in range(n): xx[i + 1], _, _ = bregman_gradient_step(gfx, ghx[i], func2 + h, gamma) gfx, _ = func1.oracle(xx[i + 1]) ghx[i + 1], hx[i + 1] = h.oracle(xx[i + 1]) Dh = hx[i + 1] - hx[i] - ghx[i] * (xx[i + 1] - xx[i]) # Set the performance metric to the final distance in Bregman distances to the last iterate problem.set_performance_metric(Dh) _, Fx = func.oracle(xx[n]) # Set the initial constraint that is the distance in function values between x0 and x^* problem.set_initial_condition(F0 - Fx <= 1) # Solve the PEP pepit_verbose = max(verbose, 0) pepit_tau = problem.solve(wrapper=wrapper, solver=solver, verbose=pepit_verbose) # Compute theoretical guarantee (for comparison) theoretical_tau = gamma / (n * (1 - L * gamma)) # Print conclusion if required if verbose != -1: print('*** Example file: worst-case performance of the NoLips in Bregman divergence ***') print('\tPEPit guarantee:\t min_t Dh(x_(t+1), x_(t)) <= {:.6} (F(x_0) - F(x_n))'.format(pepit_tau)) print('\tTheoretical guarantee :\t min_t Dh(x_(t+1), x_(t)) <= {:.6} (F(x_0) - F(x_n))'.format(theoretical_tau)) # Return the worst-case guarantee of the evaluated method (and the upper theoretical value) return pepit_tau, theoretical_tau
if __name__ == "__main__": L = 1 gamma = 1 / (2 * L) pepit_tau, theoretical_tau = wc_no_lips_1(L=L, gamma=gamma, n=5, wrapper="cvxpy", solver=None, verbose=1)